Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Persons With Intellectual Disabilities in the Criminal Justice System

Review of Issues

Jessica Jones

Queen's University, Ontario, Canada

Although the vast majority of individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are law-abiding citizens, there is a small percentage with offending behaviour that is considered antisocial, socially inappropriate, or defined as illegal. It has long been recognised that individuals with ID or mental-health needs who break the law should be dealt with differently from the general population. There have been an increasing number of empirical studies in this area; however, these have been plagued by various definitional and methodological issues. Prevalence estimates of offenders with ID are complicated by diagnostic variations and inconsistencies in the criminal justice process. International studies have shown a large range, from 2% to 40%, depending on methodological approaches. The following review will highlight the salient issues including prevalence of offending, characteristics of offenders, vulnerabilities within the legal system, assessment, and a brief overview of intervention and treatment approaches.

Key Words: o fenders • intellectual disabilities • learning disabilities • mental retardation • forensic • review

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Baroff, G.S. (1996). The mentally retarded offender. In J. W. Jacobson & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation (pp. 311-321). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Baroff, G.S., Gunn, M., & Hayes, S. (2004). Legal issues. In W. L. Lindsay, J. L. Taylor, & P. Sturmey (Eds.), O fenders with developmental disabilities (pp. 38-65). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Bean, P., & Nemitz, T. (1994). Out of depth and out of sight. London: Mencap.
  • Benson, B.A., & Ivins, J. (1992). Anger, depression and self-concept in adults with mental retardation. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 36, 169-175.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Clare, I.C.H., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1993). Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): Implications for reliability during police interview. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 295-301.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Clare, I.C.H., Gudjonsson, G.H., & Harari, P.M. (1998). Understanding of the current police caution (England & Wales). Journal of Community and Social Psychology, 8, 323-329.[CrossRef]
  • Clare, I.C.H., & Murphy, G.H. (1998). Working with offenders or alleged offenders with intellectual disabilities. In E. Emerson, A. Caine, J. Bromley, & C. Hatton (Eds.), Clinical psychology and people with intellectual disabilities (pp. 154-176). Chicester, UK: Wiley.
  • Cullen, C. (1993). The treatment of people with learning disabilities who offend. In K. Howells & C. R. Hollin (Eds.), Clinical approaches to the mentally disordered o fender (pp. 145-164). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Davidson, P., Cain, N., Sloane-Reeves, J., & Giesow, V. (1995). Crisis intervention for community-based individuals with developmental disabilities and behavioural and psychiatric disorders. Mental Retardation, 33, 21-30.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Day, K. ( 1988). A hospital-based treatment programme for male mentally handicapped offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 635-644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Day, K. ( 1993). Crime and mental retardation: a review. In K. Howells & C. R. Hollin (Eds.), Clinical approaches to the mentally disordered o fender (pp. 111-144). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Farrington, D.P. (2000). Psychosocial causes of offending. In M. G. Gelder, J. J. Lopez-Ibor, & N. Andreasen (Eds.), New Oxford textbook of psychiatry (Vol. 2, pp. 2029-2036). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Griffiths, D., Richards, D., Fedoroff, P., & Watson, S. (2002). Ethical dilemmas: Sexuality and developmental disability. Kingston, NY: National Association of Developmental Disabilities Press.
  • Haaven, J., Little, R., & Petre-Miller, D. (1990). Treating intellectually disabled sex o fenders: A model residential program. Orwell, VT: The Safer Society Press.
  • Harris, A., & Tough, S. (2004). Should actuarial risk assessments be used with sex offenders who are intellectually disabled? Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 235-241.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hayes, S. (2002). Early intervention or early incarceration? Using a screening test for intellectual disability in the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 116-174.
  • Hayes, S. (2004). Pathways for offenders with intellectual disabilities. In W. L. Lindsay, J. L. Taylor, & P. Sturmey (Eds.), O fenders with developmental disabilities (pp. 68-89). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Hodgins, S. (1992). Mental disorder, intellectual deficiency and crime: evidence from a birth cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 476-483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hodgins, S., Mednick, S.A., Brennan, P.A., Schulsinger, F., & Engberg, M. (1996). Mental disorder and crime: Evidence from a Danish cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 489-496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Holland, A.J. (1991). Challenging and offending behaviour by adults with developmental disabilities. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 17, 119-126.
  • Holland, A.J. (2004). Criminal behaviour and developmental disability: An epidemiological perspective. In W. L. Lindsay, J. L. Taylor, & P. Sturmey (Eds.), O fenders with developmental disabilities (pp. 23-34). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Holland, A.J., Clare, I.C.H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2002). Prevalence of `criminal offending' by men and women with intellectual disability and the characteristics of `offenders': Implications for research and service development. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 6-20.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Johnson, W.G., Nicholson, R.A., & Service, N.M. (1990). The relationship of competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 17, 169-185.[Abstract]
  • Johnston, S.J. (2002). Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: the evidence base. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 47-56.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lindsay, W., Murphy, L., Gordon, C., Edwards, Z., & Young, S. (2004). The dynamic risk assessment and management system: An assessment of immediate risk of violence for individuals with offending and challenging behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 267-274.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Lindsay, W.R. (2002a). Integration of recent reviews on offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 111-119.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Lindsay, W.R. (2002b). Research and literature on sex offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 74-85.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lindsay, W.R., & Beail, N. (2004). Risk assessment: Actuarial prediction and clinical judgement of offending incidents and behaviour for intellectual disability services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 229-234.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Lindsay, W.R., Law, J., & Macleod, F. (2002). Intellectual disabilities and crime: Issues in assessment, intervention and management. In A. Needs & G. Towl (Eds.), Applying psychology to forensic practice. Oxford: British Psychological Society Books/Blackwell Publishing.
  • Lindsay, W.R., & Smith, A.H.W. (1998). Responses to treatment for sex offenders with a learning disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 346-353.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lindsay, W.R., Smith, A.H.W., Law, J., Quinn, K., Anderson, A., Smith. A., et al. (2002). A treatment service for sex offenders and abusers with intellectual disability: characteristics of referrals and evaluation. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 116-174.
  • Lyall, I., Holland, A.J., Collins, S., & Styles, P. (1995). Incidence of persons with a learning disability detained in police custody: A needs assessment for service development. Medicine, Science and the Law, 35, 61-71.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Marshall, W.L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual o fenders. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • McAfee, J.K., & Gural, M. (1988). Individuals with mental retardation and the criminal justice system: The view from States' Attorneys General. Mental Retardation, 26, 5-12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mikkelsen, E.J., & Stelk, W.J. (1999). Criminal o fenders with mental retardation: Risk assessment and the continuum of community based programs. New York: NADD Press.
  • Murphy, G. (2000). Policy and service development trends: Forensic mental health and social care services. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 5, 32-35.
  • Murphy, G.H., Harnett, H., & Holland, A.J. (1995). A survey of intellectual disabilities amongst men on remand in prison. Mental Handicap Research, 8, 81-98.[Web of Science]
  • Murphy, G.H., & Mason, J. (1999). People with developmental disabilities who offend. In N. Bouras (Ed.), Psychiatric and behaviour disorders in developmental disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 226-245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Noble, J.H., & Conley, R.W. (1992). Toward an epidemiology of relevant attributes. In R. W. Conley, R. Luckasson, & G. N. Bouthilet (Eds.), The Criminal Justice System and mental retardation (pp. 17-53). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
  • Parry, J., & Drogin, E. (2000). Criminal law handbook on psychiatric and psychological evidence and testimony. Washington, DC: The American Bar Association.
  • Petrella, R.C. (1992). Defendants with mental retardation in the forensic services system. In R. W. Conley, R. Luckasson, & G. N. Bouthilet (Eds.), The Criminal Justice System and mental retardation (pp. 79-96). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. (1984). London: HMSO.
  • Quinsey, V., Book, A., & Skilling, T. (2004). A follow-up of deinstitutionalised men with intellectual disabilities and histories of antisocial behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 243-253.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Quinsey, V., Harris, F., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent o fenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Rose, J., West, C., & Clifford, D. (2000). Group interventions for anger in people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 171-181.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Simons, K. (2000). Life on the edge: The experiences of people with a learning disability who do not use specialist services. Brighton: Pavilion Publishing/ Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Smith, S.A., & Broughton, S.F. (1994). Competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility: An analysis in South Carolina. Mental Retardation, 32, 281-287.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Taylor, J.L. (2002). A review of the assessment and treatment of anger and aggression in offenders with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 57-73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Thompson, D., & Brown, H. (1997). Men with intellectual disabilities who sexually abuse: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 140-158.[Web of Science]
  • Walker, N., & McCabe, S. (1973). Crime and insanity in England (Vol. 2). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Willner, P., Jones, J., Tams, R. & Green, G. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural anger management group for clients with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 224-235.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Winter, N., Holland, A.J., & Collins, S. (1997). Factors predisposing to suspected offending by adults with self-reported learning disabilities. Psychological Medicine, 27, 595-607.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This version was published on December 1, 2007

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 51, No. 6, 723-733 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X07299343


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?