Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCusker, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCusker, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Issues Regarding the Clinical Use of the Classification of Violence Risk (COVR) Assessment Instrument

Paul J. McCusker

Department of Veterans A fairs, Cumberland, MD, paul.mccusker{at}va.gov

The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence produced an instrument for classifying hospitalized psychiatric patients according to their risk of behaving violently following discharge. The instrument, Classification of Violence Risk (COVR) has been computerized and is now commercially available to clinicians. A validation study performed by the original researchers showed that when the instrument was applied to a new sample of patients, it demonstrated a considerable reduction in positive predictive power. Potential factors affecting the instrument's accuracy in applied settings are reviewed. It is concluded that, until additional research clarifies uncertainty about the instrument, clinicians would do well to be very cautious in utilizing COVR results to make judgments as to violence risk, particularly when the test results suggest a high risk of future violence.

Key Words: COVR • violence • risk assessment

References

  • Dwyer, C. (1996). Cut scores and testing: Statistics, judgment, truth, and error. Psychological Assessment, 8, 360—362.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ellwood, R. (1993). Psychological tests and clinical discriminations. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 409—419.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Epperson, D., Kaul, J., Huot, S., Goldman, R., & Alexander, W. (2003). Minnesota Sex O fender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) technical paper: Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved October 24, 2006, from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/~dle/mnsost_download.htm.
  • Haimowitz, S. (2004). Slowing the revolving door: Community reentry of offenders with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 55, 373—375.[Free Full Text]
  • Hare, R. (1991). Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-HealthSystems.
  • Heilbrun, K. (2003). Violence risk: From prediction to management. In D. Carson & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 127—142). New York: Wiley.
  • Meehl, P., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194—216.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Miller, H. (2006). Inventory of o fender risk, needs, and strengths. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Appelbaum, P., Grisso, T., Mulvey, E., Roth, L., et al. (2005). COVR Classification of Violence Risk. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., Silver, E., et al. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312—319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H., & Robbins, P. (2006). Use of the COVR in violence risk assessment. Psychiatric Services, 57, 143.[Free Full Text]
  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P., Banks, S., Grisso, T., et al. (2005). An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56, 810—815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: the MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Ortega, R. (2006). The triumph of the actuaries: Science in violence risk assessment. Retrieved May 19, 2006, from http://www.psychinfo.com/psyccritiques/display/?artid=2006259711.
  • Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent o fenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Reid, W. (2003). Risk assessment, prediction, and foreseeability. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 9, 82—86.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Skeem, J., & Louden, J. (2006). Toward evidence-based practice for probationers and parolees mandated to mental health treatment. Psychiatric Services, 57, 333—342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Steadman, H.J., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P.S., Robbins, P.C., Mulvey, E.P., et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83—100.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stone, A., Turkkan, J., Bachrach, C., Jobe, J., Kurtzman, H., & Cain, V. (Eds.). (2000). The science of self-report. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Swets, J. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240(4587), 1285—1293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This version was published on December 1, 2007

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 51, No. 6, 676-685 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X07299227


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCusker, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCusker, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?