This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0306624X07309721v1 52/6/698    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bouffard, J. Articles by Bry, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bouffard, J. Articles by Bry, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Beyond the "Science of Sophomores"

Does the Rational Choice Explanation of Crime Generalize From University Students to an Actual Offender Sample?

Washington State University, Pullman, jbouffard{at}wsu.edu

Jeff Bry

Minnesota State Community and Technical College, Moorhead

Shamayne Smith

North Dakota State University, Fargo

Rhonda Bry

North Dakota Division of Juvenile Services, Fargo

Much of the criminological literature testing rational choice theory has utilized hypothetical scenarios presented to university students. Although this research generally supports rational choice theory, a common criticism is that conclusions from these studies may not generalize to samples of actual offenders. This study proceeds to examine this issue in two steps. First, a traditional sample of university students is examined to determine how various costs and benefits relate to their hypothetical likelihood of offending. Then the same data collection procedures are employed with a somewhat different sample of younger, adjudicated, and institutionalized offenders to determine whether the conclusions drawn from the student sample generalize to this offender sample. Results generally suggest that the content and process of hypothetical criminal decision making differ in the sample of known offenders relative to the university students. Limitations of the current study, as well as suggestions for future research, are discussed.

Key Words: rational choice • student samples • generalizability

This version was published on December 1, 2008

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 52, No. 6, 698-721 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X07309721


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?