Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennell, C.
Right arrow Articles by Snook, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennell, C.
Right arrow Articles by Snook, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validities and Abilities in Criminal Profiling: A Critique of the Studies Conducted by Richard Kocsis and His Colleagues

Craig Bennell

Carleton University, Canada, cbennell{at}connect.carleton.ca

Natalie J. Jones

Carleton University, Canada

Paul J. Taylor

University of Liverpool, UK

Brent Snook

Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada

In a recent issue of this journal, Kocsis reviewed the criminal profiling research that he and his colleagues have conducted during the past 4 years. Their research examines the correlates of profile accuracy with respect to the skills of the individual constructing the profile, and it has led Kocsis to draw conclusions that are important to the profiling field. In this article, the authors review the contributions of the Kocsis studies and critique their methodological and conceptual foundations. The authors raise a number of concerns and argue that data from the Kocsis studies fail to support many of the conclusions presented in his recent review. The authors present evidence in support of their assertions and provide recommendations that will allow future research in the area to generate data that are more meaningful and generalizable.

Key Words: criminal profiling • accuracy • skills

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 50, No. 3, 344-360 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X05277660
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
B. Snook, R. M. Cullen, C. Bennell, P. J. Taylor, and P. Gendreau
The Criminal Profiling Illusion: What's Behind the Smoke and Mirrors?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2008; 35(10): 1257 - 1276.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
B. Snook, J. Eastwood, P. Gendreau, C. Goggin, and R. M. Cullen
Taking Stock of Criminal Profiling: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2007; 34(4): 437 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
R. N. Kocsis
Validities and Abilities in Criminal Profiling: The Dilemma for David Canter's Investigative Psychology.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2006; 50(4): 458 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]