Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kocsis, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, G. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kocsis, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, G. Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Believing Is Seeing II: Beliefs and Perceptions of Criminal Psychological Profiles

Richard N. Kocsis

16 Lynden Avenue, Carlingford, Sydney, NSW 2118, Australia richard_kocsis{at}hotmail.com

Gillian Z. Heller

School of Statistics Macquarie University Sydney, New South Wales Australia

This study built upon previous research by Kocsis and Hayes (2004) by investigating whether a bias exhibited by police officers in their perception of profiles would replicate in a sample of nonpolice participants. Additionally, the relationship, if any, between the degree of belief harbored by an individual concerning the merits of profiling and their perceptions of a given profile was also investigated. The findings of this study add to the contention that the biases observed in Kocsis and Hayes’s previous study with regard to author label may be related to some intrinsic feature of the previously sampled police participants. Additionally, evidence was found to support the proposition that an individual’s degree of belief in profiling is related to their perceptions concerning the merits of a profile. Namely, the more an individual believes in the profiling technique, the greater the merit that will be perceived in a profile.

Key Words: beliefs • perceptions • criminal psychological profiling

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 48, No. 3, 313-329 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X03258482


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
B. Snook, R. M. Cullen, C. Bennell, P. J. Taylor, and P. Gendreau
The Criminal Profiling Illusion: What's Behind the Smoke and Mirrors?
Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2008; 35(10): 1257 - 1276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
B. Snook, J. Eastwood, P. Gendreau, C. Goggin, and R. M. Cullen
Taking Stock of Criminal Profiling: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis
Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2007; 34(4): 437 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
R. N. Kocsis
Validities and Abilities in Criminal Profiling: The Dilemma for David Canter's Investigative Psychology.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2006; 50(4): 458 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]