Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neapolitan, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Neapolitan, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Examination of Cross-National Variation in Punitiveness

Jerome L. Neapolitan

Tennessee Technological University, Box 5052, Cookeville, Tennessee 38505, USA

This research examines why nations differ as to rates of imprisonment, prison conditions, and use of capital punishment. Variables representing the major theoretical perspectives are used to examine differences in a much larger sample of nations than has been used in previous research. Regression analysis indicates that homicide rates—and, to a lesser degree, total crime rates—have positive associations to prison rates, whereas street-level law enforcement has a negative association. Dummy variables representing nations grouped by geographic region greatly increase variance explained, indicating a historical-cultural component to use of imprisonment. Little to no support was found for civilization theory, inequality, or unemployment variables. Discriminant analysis indicated that degree of human development and freedom as well as inequality helped classify nations according to prison conditions, whereas the freedom variable helped classify nations that did and did not use capital punishment. Dummy geographic region variables were important in classifying nations by prison conditions and capital punishment, again indicating the probable importance of historicalcultural factors.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 45, No. 6, 691-710 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X01456005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
R. Ruddell and M. G. Urbina
Weak Nations, Political Repression, and Punishment
International Criminal Justice Review, June 1, 2007; 17(2): 84 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
H.-E. Sung
Democracy and Criminal Justice in Cross-National Perspective: From Crime Control to Due Process
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2006; 605(1): 311 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
T. D. Miethe, H. Lu, and G. R. Deibert
Cross-National Variability in Capital Punishment: Exploring the Sociopolitical Sources of Its Differential Legal Status
International Criminal Justice Review, November 1, 2005; 15(2): 115 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]