This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Peterson-Badali, M. Articles by Koegl, C. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Peterson-Badali, M. Articles by Koegl, C. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Youth Court Dispositions: Perceptions of Canadian Juvenile Offenders

Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, 9th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1V6

Martin D. Ruck

The Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10016-4309, USA

Christopher J. Koegl

Earlscourt Child and Family Centre, 46 St. Clair Gardens, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6E 3V4

In North America, the approach to youth crime and juvenile offenders has become increasingly punitive, and deterrence is seen as a significant goal of sentencing. Young people’s views about their sentences can provide insight into the meaning of these experiences and their perceived connection to offending behavior. The authors interviewed 53 young male offenders about their perceptions of youth court dispositions and explored what offender, offense, and disposition characteristics predicted their beliefs about the specific and general deterrent value of their sentences. Juveniles varied in their perceptions about their sentences as deterrents, but the characteristics examined did not adequately account for this variation. Their perceptions reflected multiple approaches to achieving deterrence, including not only the get-tough focus on dispositions as punishments but the role that sentences play in helping young offenders achieve personal change. Implications of the findings for the get-tough approach to youth justice and study limitations are discussed.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 45, No. 5, 593-605 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X01455005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?