This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Farkas, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Farkas, M. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Typology of Correctional Officers

Marquette University, Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Lalumiere Hall, 340, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201-1881, USA

This descriptive study examined types of correctional officers in a systematic fashion across four dimensions: orientation toward rule enforcement, orientation toward negotiation or exchange with inmates, extent of norms of mutual obligation toward coworkers, and interest in human service delivery. In-depth interviews were conducted with officers to characterize their approaches to the job and what they perceived as officer styles. A typology was constructed from interviews with 79 officers at two medium-security state correctional institutions. The data indicated that there were distinct and varied types. Rule enforcers, hard liners, and loners reproduced official goals, values, and modes of conduct of the organization. Other types, people workers and synthetic officers, modified formal definitions and imperatives and developed their own norms, values, and ways of doing the job. Still other types identified by respondents rejected or ignored the official organizational goals.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 44, No. 4, 431-449 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X00444003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Antonio, J. L. Young, and L. M. Wingeard When Actions and Attitude Count Most: Assessing Perceived Level of Responsibility and Support for Inmate Treatment and Rehabilitation Programs Among Correctional Employees The Prison Journal, December 1, 2009; 89(4): 363 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Inderbitzin A Look From the Inside: Balancing Custody and Treatment in a Juvenile Maximum-Security Facility Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 2007; 51(3): 348 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Inderbitzin Guardians of the State's Problem Children: An Ethnographic Study of Staff Members in a Juvenile Correctional Facility The Prison Journal, December 1, 2006; 86(4): 431 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]