This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Polizzi, D. M. Articles by Hickman, L. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Polizzi, D. M. Articles by Hickman, L. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What Works in Adult Sex Offender Treatment? A Review of Prison-and Non-Prison-Based Treatment Programs

Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, 2220 LeFrak Hall, College Park, Maryland 20742, USAdpolizzi{at}crim.umd.edu

Doris Layton MacKenzie

Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, 2220 LeFrak Hall, College Park, Maryland 20742, USADMacKenzie{at}crim.umd.edu

Laura J. Hickman

Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, 2220 LeFrak Hall, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA lhickman{at}crim.umd.edu

An evaluation of 21 sex offender prison-and non-prison-based treatment programs was undertaken using the format of the University of Maryland’s 1997 report to the U.S. Congress. Eight of the studies were deemed too low in scientific merit to include in assessing the effectiveness of the treatment. Of the remaining studies, approximately 50% showed statistically significant findings in favor of sex offender treatment programs. Of six studies that showed a positive treatment effect, four incorporated a cognitive-behavioral approach. Non-prison-based sex offender treatment programs were deemed to be effective in curtailing future criminal activity. Prison-based treatment programs were judged to be promising, but the evidence is not strong enough to support a conclusion that such programs are effective. Too few studies focused on particular types of sex offenders to permit any type of conclusions about the effectiveness of programs for different sex offender typologies.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 357-374 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X99433008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Lovins, C. T. Lowenkamp, and E. J. Latessa Applying the Risk Principle to Sex Offenders: Can Treatment Make Some Sex Offenders Worse? The Prison Journal, September 1, 2009; 89(3): 344 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. A. Miller, K. Turner, and C. E. Henderson Psychopathology of Sex Offenders: A Comparison of Males and Females Using Latent Profile Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2009; 36(8): 778 - 792. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. McGuire A review of effective interventions for reducing aggression and violence Phil Trans R Soc B, August 12, 2008; 363(1503): 2577 - 2597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Harkins and A. R. Beech Examining the Impact of Mixing Child Molesters and Rapists in Group-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Sexual Offenders Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2008; 52(1): 31 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. Burdon and C. A. Gallagher Coercion and Sex Offenders: Controlling Sex-Offending Behavior Through Incapacitation and Treatment Criminal Justice and Behavior, February 1, 2002; 29(1): 87 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. MacKENZIE Corrections and Sentencing in the 21st Century: Evidence-Based Corrections and Sentencing The Prison Journal, September 1, 2001; 81(3): 299 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. MacKenzie Evidence-Based Corrections: Identifying What Works Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2000; 46(4): 457 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]