Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, W.
Right arrow Articles by Deane, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, W.
Right arrow Articles by Deane, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Normalisation in an Abnormal World: A Study of Prisoners with an Intellectual Disability

William Glaser

Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, 204/34 Queens Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia

Kirsten Deane

Department of Sociology, University of California–Berkeley, 410 Barrows Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

The most appropriate means of dealing with offenders with an intellectual disability has become a contentious issue of postdeinstitutionalisation. Proponents of normalisation argue that offenders should be held accountable and responsible for their actions in the same way as nondisabled citizens. Critics argue that such an approach fails to recognise the multiple disadvantages under which most offenders labour. Unfortunately, much of this debate is carried out at the level of rhetoric only because comparatively little is known about the experiences of offenders within the system. This study examines the characteristics and experiences of two groups of offenders with an intellectual disability held in custody: one within the mainstream prison system, the other within a secure facility on the grounds of an institution. Although not without its disadvantages, the secure facility appears better equipped to meet the multiple and complex needs of this grossly disadvantaged group of offenders.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 338-356 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X99433007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
F. Lambrick and W. Glaser
Sex Offenders With an Intellectual Disability
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, October 1, 2004; 16(4): 381 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
W. R. Lindsay and M. S. Lees
A Comparison of Anxiety and Depression in Sex Offenders With Intellectual Disability and a Control Group With Intellectual Disability
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, October 1, 2003; 15(4): 339 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]