Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peebles, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peebles, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Sentencing of Sexual Offenders in Canada

Jason E. Peebles

Functional Rehabilitation Program, Regina Health District, 2180-23rd Ave. Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, S4S 0A5

The incidence of sex crimes against women and children continues to alarm the public. Frequently, the crimes receiving greater media attention involve men with past convictions for sexual offences. To address the issue of recidivism, the Canadian criminal justice system has placed more emphasis on rehabilitation. The author contends that further changes could be introduced to facilitate the treatment of these men. Typically, judicial responses have involved short-term incarceration and/or community supervision (i.e., probation). Research on treatment efficacy supports the utilisation of specific sex offender treatment, and to some extent these interventions have been employed. In this article, legal procedures for sentencing men convicted of sexual offences are examined from the perspective of therapeutic jurisprudence and recommendations are made. These include long-term community supervision following periods of incarceration and mandated treatment specifically addressing sexually abusive behaviour. The recommendations are considered in light of the legal challenges that might be raised.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 275-290 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X99433003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. B. Waldram
Everybody Has a Story: Listening to Imprisoned Sexual Offenders
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2007; 17(7): 963 - 970.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
A. Birgden
Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Sex Offenders: A Psycho-Legal Approach to Protection
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, October 1, 2004; 16(4): 351 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]