This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Colbach, E. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Colbach, E. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Trouble with American Forensic Psychiatry

Oregon Health Sciences University, and Northwestern School of Law, Lewis & Clark College, 31441 S.W. Village Green Ct. Wilsonville, Oregon 97070, U.S.A.

Forensic psychiatry is a subspecialty with training programs and board recognition. The cornerstone of the field is expert testimony on subjects ranging from criminal responsibility to work stress to malpractice. In the adversary system, however, the impartial expert may well be a myth. By not paying enough attention to the problems of being truly objective in court, forensic psychiatrists encourage the hired gun label and risk making a mockery of their subspecialty. Solutions first demand ongoing recognition and focus on the problem by organizations and training programs. Giving up the idea of being impartial and openly becoming debaters committed to whatever issue is at hand is one possibility. Other solutions are also discussed. Giving up the work is one form of protest.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 41, No. 2, 160-167 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X97412007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?