International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raynor, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanstone, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Raynor, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanstone, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 40, No. 4, 272-284 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X96404003

Reasoning and Rehabilitation in Britain: The Results of the Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP) Programme

Peter Raynor

Department of Social Policy and Applied Social Studies, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, U.K

Maurice Vanstone

Department of Social Policy and Applied Social Studies, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, U.K.

Correctional practitioners and researchers increasingly advocate the use of programmes based on cognitive-behavioural methods. One approach in widespread use is the "Reasoning and Rehabilitation" model developed in Canada. This article describes and evaluates the first attempt to implement such a programme within a British probation service. Evaluation of the programme has included staff views, consumer views, and a reconviction study. Information arising from these is summarised and assessed, with suggestions about future practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
C. R. Hollin, J. McGuire, J. C. Hounsome, R. M. Hatcher, C. A.L. Bilby, and E. J. Palmer
Cognitive Skills Behavior Programs for Offenders in the Community: A Reconviction Analysis
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 35(3): 269 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
P. Raynor
Community penalties and Home Office research: On the way back to `nothing works'?
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 73 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
P. R. Whitehead, T. Ward, and R. M. Collie
Time for a Change: Applying the Good Lives Model of Rehabilitation to a High-Risk Violent Offender
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, October 1, 2007; 51(5): 578 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of CriminologyHome page
P. Raynor and H. Miles
Evidence-based Probation in a Microstate: The British Channel Island of Jersey
European Journal of Criminology, July 1, 2007; 4(3): 299 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]