This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Craig, R. D. Articles by Truitt, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Craig, R. D. Articles by Truitt, K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Moral Problem Solving among Inmates in a Maximum Security Correctional Institution

Patuxent Institution, P.O. Box 700, Jessup, Maryland 20794-0700, U.S.A.

Kenneth Truitt

Patuxent Institution, P.O. Box 700, Jessup, Maryland 20794-0700, U.S.A.

The authors initiated a closed-ended group for inmates in Patuxent Institution, a maximum security correctionalfacility located in Jessup, Maryland. This group was designed to provide aformat, by which inmates could examine and discuss a series of moral dilemmas in the Kohlbergian tradition, as well as provide a vehicle by which the authors could assess the level of moral judgment employed by the group members. Based on this experience, it was determined that the participants' moral judgments essentially reflected Stage 2 thinking, the stage often referred to as Instrumental Relativism. Furthermore, the analysis showed that a significant correlation existed between the inmates'stage of moral development and recorded institutional infractions, a general measure of institutional adjustment. The present essay summarizes observations related to the nature of these moral judgments made by the inmate participants and speculates on the interrelationship of these judgments to past criminality and institutional adjustment.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?