Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-David, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ben-David, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Staff-to-Inmates Relations in a Total Institution: A Model of Five Modes of Association

Sarah Ben-David

Mental Health and Clinical Criminology, Israeli Prison Service, Ramle, Department of Criminology, Bar-Ilan University, 52900 Ramat-Gan, Israel

The findings presented in the following paper suggest that contrary to Goffman's description of staff-inmate relations in total institutions, the social relations between prison staff members and prisoners are diverse and not necessarily fixed and/or hostile. The paper describes five relationship prototypes ranging from the Punitive Relations Prototype to the Integrative Relation Prototype. The prototypes are measured by staff perception of the inmates; orientation of the relationship; relation's model; and social distance. The findings were gathered and confirmed by three phases of research: participant observation; staff questionnaire; and inmate interviews.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 209-219 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X9203600305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
A. Korn
Rates of incarceration and main trends in Israeli prisons
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2003; 3(1): 29 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
U. Timor
Constructing a Rehabilitative Reality in Special Religious Wards in Israeli Prisons
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 1998; 42(4): 340 - 359.
[Abstract]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
S. Ben-David, P. Silfen, and D. Cohen
Fearful Custodial or Fearless Personal Relations: Prison Guards' Fear as a Factor Shaping Staff-Inmate Relation Prototype
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 1996; 40(2): 94 - 104.
[Abstract]


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
S. Ben-David and P. Silfen
In Quest of a Lost Father? Inmates' Preferences of Staff Relation in a Psychiatric Prison Ward
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 1994; 38(2): 131 - 139.
[Abstract]