Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reliability of the Revised Beta in a Correctional Setting

Allan R. Barnes

University of Alaska-Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508, U.S.A.

Roderick L. Hall

Florida Department of Corrections, 1311 Winewood Boulevard, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500, U.S.A.

Test-retest reliability data for the Revised Beta in a prison setting is almost non-existent. The present study compared scores from 59 male inmates who were administered the Revised Beta at the beginning of their incarceration and then again when they reached their permanent institution. A reliability coefficient of r = .75 was obtained comparing favorably with the reliability measures of other psychometric instruments used in corrections. These results suggest that Revised Beta scores are not significantly affected by the reception station environment. Only those inmates who initially obtained low scores may require retesting.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 35, No. 2, 182-184 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X9103500209


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?