Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Correctional Treatment and Intervention Theory: Bringing Sociology and Criminology Back in

Don C. Gibbons

Department of Sociology, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon 97207, U.S.A.

This essay begins by noting the close ties between sociology and criminology, on the one hand, and correctional treatment, on the other, that existed for the first half of the 20th century in America. That period was followed by the "nothing works" era of the 1960s and 1970s. A considerable share of the analysis in this paper centers on the author's primer on correctional treatment, Changing the Lawbreaker. Many of the weaknesses and strengths of sociologically-based treatment theory in corrections are pointed up in that examination. Two major conclusions are warranted: diagnostic typologies have failed to reflect the diversity of offender behavior, and correctional theorizing by sociological criminologists has been unduly optimistic. At the same time, the "nothing works" or punitive approach to lawbreakers is also flawed. Reaffirmation of rehabilitation is called for, and finally, some new directions for correctional treatment, based on criminological knowledge, are explored.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 255-271 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X8603000309


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
S. Pennell, C. Curtis, and D. C. Scheck
Controlling Juvenile Delinquency: An Evaluation of an Interagency Strategy
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1990; 36(2): 257 - 275.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Prison JournalHome page
M. S. Vaughn and A. D. Sapp
Less Than Utopian: Sex Offender Treatment in a Milieu of Power Struggles, Status Positioning, And Inmate Manipulation in State Correctional Institutions
The Prison Journal, October 1, 1989; 69(2): 73 - 89.
[PDF]